Block XYZ

May 8, 2026 · original source

AI-assessed accountability
5/10

Block's Stock Surged 25% When Dorsey Fired 4,000 — While Spending $2.3B on Buybacks

Original

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

Translated

Jack Dorsey just fired more than 4,000 people — nearly half of Block's entire workforce — bringing the company from over 10,000 employees down to roughly 6,000. He says the business is strong (it is: gross profit hit $10.36 billion in 2025, up 17% year-over-year), the decision isn't about trouble (it isn't), and that "intelligence tools" are enabling a new way of working that makes this many people unnecessary. In plain English: Block tripled its headcount during the pandemic, overhired aggressively, and now the same CEO who hired them is firing them and calling it vision. Here is what Dorsey doesn't say plainly: Block spent $2.3 billion buying back its own stock in 2025 alone, and announced authorization for $5 billion more. That $2.3 billion in buybacks — a number that enriches existing shareholders, not workers — is more than four times the estimated $450–$500 million restructuring cost of the layoffs themselves. Block also raised its 2026 guidance sharply the same day it announced the cuts: gross profit target of $12.2 billion, adjusted operating income of $3.2 billion. Wall Street celebrated accordingly — the stock surged 24–25% after hours when the firing was announced. The 4,000 people leaving did not share in that pop. The "AI is changing everything" framing deserves scrutiny. Dorsey says "intelligence tools" are enabling a fundamentally new way of working and that this change "is accelerating rapidly." That is a speculative productivity claim, not a demonstrated one. Block has not published audited numbers showing which tasks its AI tools are replacing, at what measured rate, or on what timeline. What is documented is this: Block hired massively from 2020 to 2022, gross profit per employee fell from $678,000 to $482,000 during that surge, and the post-layoff target is $2 million per employee — a ratio engineered by cutting the denominator, not by proving machines are doing the work. Calling that an "AI transformation" is marketing language for a workforce-planning failure the workers are now paying for. To his credit, Dorsey does not hide behind passive voice or pretend this is anyone else's decision. He says "I made this decision, and I'll own it." He put severance details first — 20 weeks base pay plus one week per year of tenure, equity vesting through end of May, six months of health coverage, and $5,000 in transition support — and kept communication channels open for goodbyes. Those are real, specific commitments that treat the people being fired as people. But Dorsey's own compensation is $2.75 a year — no cash, no equity beyond that — which means the pay-asymmetry test cannot be run against him personally. The asymmetry runs instead between the $2.3 billion returned to shareholders via buybacks and the $450–$500 million it cost to fire 4,000 people. Block chose, repeatedly and in writing, to prioritize shareholder returns over workforce stability. That is a choice about who keeps the money, not a response to necessity.

Why this score

The memo is unusually direct: Dorsey names himself as the decision-maker, puts severance specifics first, and avoids passive-voice blame-shifting (passive voice ratio: 5%). The high specificity count (11 numbers/dates) and low euphemism count (3) confirm this. However, the 3-cap is unlocked not by a leadership consequence — Dorsey's $2.75 salary means no meaningful comp sacrifice is possible here — but by documented external-cause-adjacent evidence: the RESEARCHED FACTS confirm a genuine structural productivity collapse (gross profit per employee fell from $678K to $482K after the pandemic hiring surge) and a multi-round, years-long correction (1,000 cuts in Jan 2024, 931 in March 2025, 4,000+ in Feb 2026), which independently documents the scale of the original mis-hiring. More importantly, the severance package — 20 weeks base pay, 1 week/year tenure, 6 months health coverage, equity vesting through May, $5,000 transition support — is specific, worker-centric, and substantially above industry norm, satisfying the 6+ criterion. The score does not reach 7 because the "AI transformation" framing is speculative and unverified, and the $2.3B in buybacks alongside a raised 2026 guidance lands uncomfortably close to a choice about shareholder returns over worker retention. Score: 5 — the cap is unlocked by the generous, specific severance (a concrete worker-support commitment), but the AI-washing framing and the buyback-vs-severance arithmetic prevent a higher score.

What the memo left out

  • Stock surge on firing day. Block's stock jumped 24–25% after hours when the 4,000-person layoff was announced on February 26, 2026, adding billions in market value. finance.yahoo.com ↗
  • Buybacks vs. severance cost. Block spent $2.3 billion on share repurchases in 2025 — more than four times the $450–$500 million estimated cost of the layoffs — and authorized $5 billion more in November 2025. stockanalysis.com ↗
  • Dorsey tripled headcount, then reversed. Jack Dorsey grew Block from 3,835 employees at end of 2019 to over 10,000 by early 2026, then fired over 4,000 of them — the same executive who hired them is the one cutting them. cnbc.com ↗
  • Raised guidance same day as layoffs. Block raised its 2026 gross profit target to $12.20 billion (18% growth) and adjusted operating income to $3.20 billion the same day it announced firing nearly half its workforce. investing.com ↗
  • Productivity collapse from overhiring. Gross profit per Block employee fell from $678,000 in 2019 to $482,000 in 2022 after the pandemic hiring surge — the layoffs are correcting a workforce-planning failure, not an AI transformation. medium.com ↗