Original
Upwork CEO Hayden Brown shared the following message with employees on May 7, 2026.
Team –
I have difficult news to share today: we will be executing a layoff that impacts approximately a quarter of our workforce. This was a tough call. I fully own it and want to share with you what we're doing and why we're doing it.
First: these actions are not taking place today. We will be notifying everyone next week about whether their role is impacted and will send an email to the company the morning the notifications begin. Tomorrow we’ll host an All Hands, and while we won’t have the answers to all your questions, it’s important we get together to hear them and connect as a community.
I want to explain why we are doing this.
The business is healthy, despite a choppy labor market backdrop and near-term volatility. We spent 2025 refounding Upwork, rebuilding our product, our customer focus, and our operations. Our growth strategies are working, positioning us for a strong future. However, external dynamics in Q1 indicate growth may be slower in the near term. We chose to take this step now for two reasons: (1) we know we move faster with smaller teams. Our 2024 layoff followed by excellent 2025 execution give us confidence this works. (2) To meet our profitability goals in a challenging environment.
Here is how we arrived at our decisions.
Our approach was to rethink the company from the bottom up, not incrementally change what exists. We scrutinized what it takes to run every function in this business with both people and technology. We are consolidating redundant work and collapsing workflows to reduce handoffs.
Two pizza teams are dead. AI means smaller, differently resourced teams in product and engineering can make a bigger impact than ever.
Fewer layers means faster decisions. Flatter is better, and our new structure will optimize for this.
We did not make decisions lightly, and decisions of this complexity are never perfect. Some things will break. But we're ready to fix those things, adjust our approach, and keep moving forward in the service of our customers and innovating for them at a rapid clip.
For those who will be leaving, I want to share my heartfelt gratitude for everything you've done to build Upwork to what it is. It's been a tremendous journey, and what we’ve done together is something to be proud of. Thank you. Your leadership team and I are committed to making this transition as smooth as possible.
For those who will be staying, I know this is a significant change for us. I look forward to getting together the week of May 18th to share more about our future plans.
Hayden
Translated
Upwork CEO Hayden Brown announced on May 7, 2026 that the company is firing approximately a quarter of its workforce — roughly 25% of all employees. The people losing their jobs did not get to make this decision. Brown did.
Brown says "the business is healthy" and then immediately explains why he's firing a quarter of the company. Those two things don't sit comfortably next to each other. Upwork posted $115.4M in net profit in FY2025 on $787.8M in revenue — a profitable, growing company. The stated reasons are: (1) smaller teams move faster, a claim Brown supports by citing the 2024 layoff as a success, and (2) hitting profitability targets in a "challenging environment." In other words: we are profitable, we want to be more profitable, and the people being fired are how we close that gap.
The memo invokes AI explicitly — "AI means smaller, differently resourced teams" — as a reason to cut headcount. That is a speculative claim dressed up as operational fact. No audited productivity numbers are cited. No specific tasks are named. No timeline is given for when AI tools will demonstrably replace the work the fired employees were doing. "AI makes us need fewer people" is an assertion, not a demonstrated result, and Upwork is asking approximately a quarter of its workforce to absorb the cost of that bet.
Brown writes that he "fully owns" this decision. But owning a decision rhetorically and bearing a personal cost for it are different things. The memo names no pay cut, no bonus decline, no equity forfeiture, no buyback pause — nothing Brown will give up that he otherwise would have kept. Gratitude and an All Hands meeting are not consequences. The people being fired are the ones paying the actual price here.
No severance amounts, no healthcare continuation periods, no specific transition support terms, and no immigration assistance for visa-holding employees are mentioned anywhere in this memo. People losing their jobs after the week of May 12th are told to expect "a smooth transition" — with no details about what that means in dollars, weeks, or benefits.
Why this score
Brown names himself by name, says "I fully own it," and the memo is relatively direct — it names a specific scale (approximately a quarter of the workforce), explains the rationale without heavy euphemism (LINGUISTIC SIGNALS show only 2 euphemisms and 6% passive voice), and uses "we" 34 times, signaling at least rhetorical ownership. However, "I fully own it" is rhetorical, not concrete: no penalty to Brown is named — no pay cut, no bonus decline, no equity surrender, no buyback pause. The memo also partially blames "external dynamics in Q1" and a "choppy labor market," invoking externalities that leadership is supposed to manage. No (a) concrete leadership consequence and no (b) independently documented external cause appear in the provided context; the 3-cap would ordinarily apply, but the score is held to 2 because despite naming a number and a responsible executive, the memo withholds all specific severance, healthcare, and transition support figures — the absence of any worker-support specificity is a meaningful gap that drops this below a clean 3.